Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India and others (1983)
Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India and others (1983) | Global Health & Human Rights Database. Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India and others (1983) AIR 1984 SC 802; 1984 Lab IC 560; 1983 (2) SCALE 1151; (1984) 3 SCC 161; [1984 ] 2 SCR 67; 1984 (16) UJ 29. Download Judgment: English. Judgment Details.
اقرأ أكثر'No stone crushers operating in Saleli' - The Times of India
The high court of Bombay at Goa recently disposed of a petition filed against stone crusher units and quarries in Saleli, after the government filed a
اقرأ أكثرM/S V K Stone Crusher vs Raj State Pollution Control on 20 July, …
The Apex Court in M.C. Mehta v. Union of India (Stone Crushing Case), 1992 Supp (2) SCC 85, cases relating to Stone crushing operation in the vicinity of Delhi, wherein the total closure of the operation ordered by Union of India and crusher owner instead of approaching the Supreme Court in the pending matters, filed writ petitions in High ...
اقرأ أكثرfr/crusher inde versus pétition.md at main · sbmboy/fr
Contribute to sbmboy/fr development by creating an account on GitHub.
اقرأ أكثرAssociation Stone Crusher vs Union Of India And Ors May Kindly …
maan singh, advocate, for r-3) civil writ petition no. 6424/2021 between: m/s drishti stone crusher, through its proprietor hiteshwar singh, son of maheshwar singh, age 47 years, resident of rupi palace, ward no.4, lower sultanpur, kullu, tehsil and district kullu, h.p.
اقرأ أكثرNot so green: How NGT-mandated panels favour polluters in …
Photo: iStock. Various petitions have been filed before the National Green Tribunal (NGT),for the last three years against illegal mining and pollution by stone crusher units in the Rajmahal Hills in Jharkhand. The petitioners claimed that the companies indulged in indiscriminate mining and operating stone crushers in the hills of Sahebganj ...
اقرأ أكثرM.C. Mehta v. Union of India, WP 4677/1985 (1992.05.15) (Delhi
No stone crusher shall operate in the above-said area from August 15, 1992 onward. (3) The writ petitions filed by the owners/proprietors of stone crushers in the Delhi High Court which have been transferred to this Court shall stand dismissed with no …
اقرأ أكثرRadhey Stone Crusher (M/S.) v. Rajasthan State Pollution
the petitioner stated in the writ petitioner that on the application dated 2.1.2007 submitted by the petitioner, the rajasthan state pollution control board (in short state board) after due enquiry investigation and having satisfied that the crusher of the petitioner has taken all the required anti air pollution control measures granted its …
اقرأ أكثرid/kompetisi versus crusher india versus.md at main · sbmboy/id
. Contribute to sbmboy/id development by creating an account on GitHub.
اقرأ أكثرU'khand HC bans operation of Alaknanda stone crusher in Srinagar
Large. Nainital: The Uttarakhand high court on Friday heard a petition against the operation of Alaknanda stone crusher in Pauri Garhwal's Srinagar town. After hearing the …
اقرأ أكثرPetition to shut stone crusher near Rajaji: HC ... - The …
Petition to shut stone crusher near Rajaji: HC asks environment dept, National Wildlife Board to reply by June 18 Sonali Mishra / TNN / Apr 28, 2022, 04:26 IST AA
اقرأ أكثرWhat is a Writ and What is a Writ Petition? - Vakilsearch
A court publishes a writ as a formal written order. The Supreme Court or the High Court are permitted to issue warrants, directions, orders and so on. All the above mentioned are writs. One can file a writ petition in the High Court under Article 226. One shall file a write petition in the Supreme Court under Article 32) of India when any of ...
اقرأ أكثرBandhua Mukti Morcha Case [Bandhua Mukti Morcha Vs Union Of India]
Introduction. The case of Bandhua Mukti Morcha Vs Union of India and Ors is one of the historical judgments in contention with the upliftment of Bonded labor in India. The petitioner is Bandhua Mukti Morcha which is a philanthropic non-governmental organization that works for the welfare of individuals and is dedicated to the cause of the ...
اقرأ أكثرM.C. Mehta v. Union of India, WP 4677/1985 (1992.05.15) (Delhi …
Union of India and Others. Writ Petition (Civil) No. 4677 of 1985. (Kuldip Singh, K. Ramaswamy JJ) 15.05.1992. ORDER. 1. We reserved judgment in these matters on April 24, 1992. We heard learned counsel for the parties at considerable length for several days. We have been taken through the provisions of the Delhi Development Act, 1957, Master ...
اقرأ أكثرBirla Cement Works And Anr. Etc. vs State Of Rajasthan And Ors.
The petition was registered as S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3479/99. The petition was dismissed on 9-12-99 on the statement made by the counsel for the Department that it was covered by the decision of the Court dated 7-8-99 rendered in Ambika Crushers v. Union of India. The petitioner preferred a special appeal against the said judgment on the ...
اقرأ أكثرJUDGMENT/ORDER IN - WRIT - C No. 47735 of 2013 at Allahabad …
The petitioner, a stone crusher has come up in this writ petition praying for quashing the order dated 02/5/2013, passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Lalganj, District-Mirzapur, seizing the stone crusher of the petitioner as well as the notice dated 12/8/2013, issued by the District Magistrate, Mirzapur. ... He has further placed reliance ...
اقرأ أكثرNational Legal Services Authority v. Union of India
In 2012, the National Legal Services Authority, an Indian statutory body constituted to give legal representation to marginalized sections of society, filed a writ petition with the Supreme Court of India. The petition was joined by a non-governmental organization representing the Kinnar transgender community, and an individual who identified ...
اقرأ أكثرPetition to shut stone crusher near Rajaji: HC ... - The Times of India
Petition to shut stone crusher near Rajaji: HC asks environment dept, National Wildlife Board to reply by June 18 Sonali Mishra / TNN / Apr 28, 2022, 04:26 IST AA
اقرأ أكثرOrder of rejecting GST appeal not filed electronically was to be set ...
It filed writ petition against the same. High Court Held The Honorable High Court observed that rule 108(1) of CGST Rules, 2017 is as clear as crystal to effect that an appeal to Appellate Authority under section 107(1) shall be filed along with Form GST APL-01 and relevant documents either electronically or otherwise as may be notified by ...
اقرأ أكثرJacob Puliyel vs Union Of India on 2 May, 2022 - Indian Kanoon
Supreme Court of India. Jacob Puliyel vs Union Of India on 2 May, 2022. Author: L. Nageswara Rao. Bench: L. Nageswara Rao, B.R. Gavai. Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No. 607 of 2021 JACOB PULIYEL …..PETITIONER Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ….. RESPONDENTS …
اقرأ أكثرSupreme Court Judgement On Stone Crushers Uttarakhand - Tech …
Jp Stone Crushers Pvt Ltd Vs Assessee. For this, the learned AR submitted true copies of the order of ITAT in the case of Ms. Uttarakhand Stone Products Pvt. Ltd. in ITA No.347Del2009 of Bench H, New Delhi dated 26.04.2010 and Ms. Jai Shree Ram Stone Crushers I Pvt. Ltd. in ITA No.348Del2009 of. Mc Mehta Vs Union Of India Amp Ors …
اقرأ أكثرM.c. Mehta V. Union of India & Ors - B&B Associates LLP
3. Some Writ Petitions, which were filled by the owners/proprietors of stone-crushers in the Delhi High Court and which have been directed to be transferred to this Court are dismissed. [360 E] ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition (C) No.4677 of 1985. (Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India). WITH
اقرأ أكثرM/S Slv Stone Crusher vs The State Of Karnataka on 12 February, …
Free for one month and pay only if you like it. Karnataka High Court. M/S Slv Stone Crusher vs The State Of Karnataka on 12 February, 2020. Author: Chief Justice Chandangoudar. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2020 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND …
اقرأ أكثرMohit Stone Crusher vs Phool Singh And Ors. on 7 November, 2006
The petitioner i.e. M/s Mohil Stone Crusher purchased a piece of land comprised in Rect. No. 14, Khasra Nos. 12 and 19 on 21.2.2005 with an intention to install a stone crusher. It was claimed that the said activity would ultimately become cause for environmental hazard which shall tell upon the health of the inhabitants of village Koliwala.
اقرأ أكثرBan on Wayanad crusher units: Kerala HC orders for ... - The Times of India
Justice N Nagaresh issued the directive after considering a total of 12 petitions filed by crusher unit operators challenging inclusion of their businesses in the ban on mining operations near ...
اقرأ أكثرMookambika Stone Crusher vs The Managing Director Mescom …
Free for one month and pay only if you like it. Karnataka High Court. Mookambika Stone Crusher vs The Managing Director Mescom on 15 April, 2008. Author: N.K.Patil. {HE EIGH COUEI (TE IQ BE "A T41 ' A," 1 BA Egg LQEE '!if.E,I§g.Z37fl2006 1 AT XALIQAI 11$ ifi THE Hifii-i GfiURT GF Kfiififi .T:'Kl'i'i A unwunhung. on-no THIS TI-IE Iafi ...
اقرأ أكثرRadhey Stone Crusher (M/S.) v. Rajasthan State Pollution
The Apex Court in M.C Mehta v. Union of India (Stone Crushing Case), 1992 Supp (2) SCC 85, cases relating to Stone crushing operation in the vicinity of Delhi, wherein the total closure of the operation ordered by Union of India and crusher owner instead of approaching the Supreme Court in the pending matters, filed writ petitions in High Court ...
اقرأ أكثرM/S.Velan Crusher vs The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control ... on 24 …
After conducting inspection of the Unit, the second respondent rejected the grant of consent on 19.03.2018 by proceedings under both the said Acts on the grounds that one M/s.Selvi Industries, M/s.Sri Jeyamurugan Crusher, M/s.Sri Bagavathi Crusher and M/s.Sri Bagavathi Blue Metals are located within 1 kilometer radius from the petitioner ...
اقرأ أكثرNew Tarai Stone Crusher vs State Of Uttarakhand on 30 October, …
19) Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Uttarakhand & others vs. Kumaon Stone Crusher in Civil Appeal No.14874 of 2017 decided on 15.09.2017 has dealt with a similar issue wherein M/s Kumaon Stone Crusher filed a petition before this High Court for quashing the order dated 14.06.1999 issued by the Conservator of Forest and order dated ...
اقرأ أكثرSpecial Leave Petition vs Review Petition vs Curative ... - ClearIAS
Constitutional Provisions behind Review Petition. Under Article 137 of the Constitution of India and the rules made under Article 145, the Supreme Court of India has the power to review its judgment pronounced by it.. As per Supreme Court rules, a review petition is to be filed within 30 days of the pronouncement of judgment or order and that petition should …
اقرأ أكثرTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v. Competition Commission Of India …
Delhi High Court: CCI has Jurisdiction to hear Complaint against Ericsson for Patent Rights Abuse. In a recent judgment delivered by the Delhi High Court on March 30, 2016 in the case of Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v.Competition Commission of India (W.P.(C) 464/2014 & CM Nos.911/2014 & 915/2014), it was held that although while passing an order, …
اقرأ أكثرstone crusher and high court of karnataka
supreme court order on stone crushers in karnataka. Oct 18, 2020· Karnataka Regulation of Stone Crushers Act, 2011. Whereas the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka by its order dated: 10.7.1998 in Writ Petition 7078/1997 has directed the State Government to formulate a policy regulating the carrying on the business related to the crushing of stones by …
اقرأ أكثرB.S.K.Crusher v. Revenue Tahsildar | Madras High Court - Casemine
4.In this view of the matter, it is left open to the writ petitioner to initiate appropriate proceedings under the provisions of the Employees Compensation Act, and the present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable. Thus, the writ petition stands dismissed as non maintainable.
اقرأ أكثرM/S. Balaji Crusher & Ors. v. National Green Tribunal ... - Casemine
Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests, 2014 (4) EFLT 417, in which it was held, following L. Chandrakumar v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 1125, that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is maintainable against the orders passed by the National Green Tribunal under the Act of 2010.
اقرأ أكثرpetition in mobile crusher
India Crusher Versus Petition Jaw Crusher. Stone Crusher Petitions Petition in mobile crusher mp mp stone crusher machine capacity mph mpj7 crawlertype mobile crusher product line jaw crusher j mp thulasihospital jaw crusher j mp mpj series jaw stone crushers linear rock crusher mp j series mobile jaw plant has reached the world skd group is a ...
اقرأ أكثرM/S. PANDURANGA STONE CRUSHERS VERSUS THE UNION OF …
AAP AND CO., CHARTERED ACCOUNTS THROU AUTHORISED PARTNER Versus UNION OF INDIA & 3 other (s) – 2019 (7) TMI 401 – GUJARAT HIGH COURT; Saji S., Proprietor, Adithya and Ambadi Traders, Ranjith R., Proprietor, Ranjith Roadlines Versus The Commissioner, State GST, The Assistant State Tax Officer – 2018 (11) TMI 954 – KERALA …
اقرأ أكثرM/S Pragati India Stone Crusher Thr. Ajay Tripathi Vs. M P Poorva ...
M/S Pragati India Stone Crusher Thr. Ajay Tripathi Vs. M P Poorva Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Ltd. Electricity Act, 2003 ... Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge) WRIT PETITION, 1102 of 2022, Judgment Date: Feb 26, 2022. M/S Pragati India Stone Crusher Thr. Ajay Tripathi Vs. M P Poorva Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Ltd. Back to Judgments ...
اقرأ أكثرPetition · Bring Multiversus Game to India! · Change.org
Bring Multiversus Game to India! Bring Multiversus Game to India! 0 have signed. Let's get to 100! At 100 signatures, ... At 100 signatures, this petition is more likely to be featured in recommendations! Start a petition of your own. This petition starter stood up and took action. Will you do the same?
اقرأ أكثر